In considering the sense of Genesis 1:2 we are blessed to have the guidance of investigations into the early earth’s geology. The harmony of the testimony of Genesis and of the testimony am geology is amazing – the earth was covered completely by the ocean [“the deep”] and the continents had not yet emerged above the waters. A heavy dense fog of water and carbon dioxide blanketed everything. Hence, the earth indeed was [Strong’s H1961 “hayah”] without form and void (empty). While allowing for the complexity of “hayah” no special adjustments of the KJV translation have been embraced by modern translators.
In Genesis 1:2, the earth was without form and void; and darkness was upon the face of the deep and the Spirit of God moved upon the face of the waters. The linking verb "was" has several different meanings. So is it possible that Genesis 1:2 is saying that the earth "became" without form and void? Can you replace "was" with another linking verb? (India)
Related Posts
How did Judas Iscariot die? Matthew 27 and Acts 1 seem to contradict each other.
September 27th, 2024